My purpose here is purely historical. It is not an attempt to
resolve the question as to whether Russell did or did not countenance
nonclassical logics, and if so, which nonclassical logics, and still less to
demonstrate whether he himself contributed, in any manner, to the development of nonclassical logic. Rather, I want merely to explore and insofar as possible document, whether, and to what extent, if any, Russell interacted with the various, either the various candidates or their, ideas that
Dejnoˇzka and others have proposed as potentially inﬂuential in Russell’s
intellectual reactions to nonclassical logic or to the philosophical concepts
that might contribute to his reactions to nonclassical logics.