Bienvenidos !!!

Este blog no tiene ninguna otra finalidad que compartir y ayudar a reflexionar sobre lógica y filosofía de la lógica, filosofía de las matemáticas, de la ciencia etc.
El blog es absolutamente gratuito. Mando los artículos a quienes lo soliciten y me envíen su mail . Es importante difundir nuestras reflexiones, discusiones, investigaciones y logros en el campo de las disciplinas que nos apasionan .

Gracias por seguir el blog !!!

Claudio Conforti

lunes, 30 de mayo de 2011

Bibliografia sobre Independence Friendly Logic

Alpern, S., 1991. Cycles in extensive form perfect information games, Journal
of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 159, 1–17.

Bacharach, M., 1985. Some extensions of a claim of Aumann in an axiomatic
model of knowledge, Journal of Economic Theory 37, 167–190.

Blinov, A., 1994. Semantic games with chance moves, Synthese 99, 311–

Bonnay, D., 2004. Independence and games, to appear in Philosophia Scientiae.
Bradfield, J.C., 2000. Independence: logics and concurrency, Lecture Notes in
Computer Science 1862, 247–261.

Forget, D. et al., (eds), 1998. Negation and Polarity: Syntax and Semantics,
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

van Fraassen, J., 1969. Presuppositions, supervaluations, and free logic, in K.
Lambert (ed.), The Logical Way of Doing Things, New Haven: Yale University
Press, 67–91.

Geanakoplos, J., 1989. Game theory without partitions, and applications to
speculation and consensus, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper 914, Yale

Harsanyi, J., 1967. Games with incomplete information played by ‘Bayesian’
players. Part I: The basic model, Management Science 14, 159–182.

Hendrix, G.G., 1979. Encoding knowledge in partitioned networks, in Findler,
N.V. (ed.), Associative Networks: Representation and Use of Knowledge by
Computers, Orlando: Academic Press, 51–92.

Hintikka, J., 1986. Logic of conversation as a logic of dialogue, in R.E. Grandy
and R.Warner (eds), Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, Oxford: Clarendon
Press, 259–276.

Hintikka, J., 1996. The Principles of Mathematics Revisited, New York: Cambridge
University Press.

Hintikka, J., 1997. No scope for scope?, Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 515–

Hintikka, J., 2002. Hyperclassical logic (a.k.a. IF logic) and its implications for
logical theory, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8, 404–423.

Hintikka, J. & Sandu, G., 1989. Informational independence as a semantical
phenomenon, in J.E. Fenstad, I.T. Frolov, and R. Hilpinen (eds), Logic,
Methodology and Philosophy of Science,Vol. 8,Amsterdam:North-Holland,

Hintikka, J. and Sandu,G., 1997.Game-theoretical semantics, in J. vanBenthem
and A. ter Meulen (eds), Handbook of Logic and Language, Amsterdam:
Elsevier, 361–410.

Hodges,W., 1997. Compositional semantics for a language of imperfect information,
Logic Journal of the IGPL 5, 539–563.

Janssen, T.M.V., 2002. On the interpretation of IF logic, Journal of Logic,
Language and Information 11, 367–387.

Morris, S., 1994.Revising knowledge: a hierarchial approach, in Fagin,R. (ed.),
Proceedings of the 5thConference on TheoreticalAspects ofReasoning about
Knowledge, Morgan Kaufmann, 160–174.

Parikh, P., 2001. The Use of Language, Stanford: CSLI.
18 IF Logic and Incomplete Information

Peirce, C.S., 1931–58. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols., ed.
by C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A.W. Burks. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard
University Press.

Peirce, C.S., 1967.Manuscripts in the Houghton Library of Harvard University,
as identified by R. Robin, Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S.
Peirce (Amherst: University of Massachusettes Press, 1967), and in The
Peirce Papers: A supplementary catalogue, Transactions of the C.S. Peirce
Society 7, 1971, 37–57.

Pietarinen, A.-V., 2001a. Intentional identity revisited, Nordic Journal of Philosophical
Logic 6, 144–188.

Pietarinen, A.-V., 2001b. Varieties of IFing, in Pauly, M., and Sandu, G. (eds),
Proceedings of the ESSLLI 2001 Workshop on Logic and Games, University
of Helsinki.

Pietarinen, A.-V., 2001c. Propositional logic of imperfect information: foundations
and applications, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 42, 193–

Pietarinen, A.-V., 2002. Knowledge constructions for artificial intelligence, in
M.-S. Hacid, Z.W. Ras, D.A. Zighed and Y. Kodratoff (eds), Foundations of
Intelligent Systems, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2366, Springer,

Pietarinen, A.-V., 2003a. Peirce’s game-theoretic ideas in logic, Semiotica 144,

Pietarinen, A.-V., 2003b. What do epistemic logic and cognitive science have
to do with each other?, Cognitive Systems Research 4, 169–190.

Pietarinen, A.-V., 2004a. Semantic games in logic and epistemology, in D.
Gabbay, J. P. Van Bendegem, S. Rahman and J. Symons (eds), Logic, Epistemology
and the Unity of Science, Dordrecht Kluwer.

Pietarinen, A.-V., 2004b. Peirce’s magic lantern: moving pictures of thought, to
appear in Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal
in American Philosophy.

Pietarinen, A.-V., 2004c. Some games logic plays, in D. Vanderveken (ed.),
Logic, Thought and Action, Dordrecht Kluwer.

Rasmusen, E., 1994. Games and Information (first edition 1989), Cambridge,
Mass.: Blackwell.

Rebuschi, M., 2004. IF epistemic action logic and IF first-order logic, this

Sandu, G., 1993. On the logic of informational independence and its applications,
Journal of Philosophical Logic 22, 29–60.

Sandu, G. and Pietarinen, A., 2001. Partiality and games: propositional logic,
Logic Journal of the IGPL 9, 107–127.

Sandu, G. and Pietarinen, A., 2003. Informationally independent connectives,
in G. Mints and R. Muskens (eds), Games, Logic, and Constructive Sets,
Stanford: CSLI, 23–41.

Selten, R. andWooders,M., 2001. Cyclic games: an introduction and examples,
Games and Economic Behavior 34, 138–152.

Tulenheimo, T., 2004. Independence-Friendly Modal Logic: Studies in its
Expressive Power and Theoretical Relevance, dissertation, University of

Väänänen, J., 2002. On the semantics of informational independence, Logic
Journal of the IGPL 10, 339–352.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario

Gracias por dejarme tu comentario